Saturday, 23 October 2010

SOS Party: The Truth, the Facts and the Lies

"There is no truth, only facts and lies," said my mum.

It’s been since watching 'September Clues' and 'Moon Rising’; I have come to the conclusion that everything I've believed to be true is in fact a lie.

Forum Questions answered

Thank you everyone for taking the time to reply. I was excited about joining this forum and the replies have made it all worthwhile.

Hey look everyone. The SOS Party is my answer to politics.

It’s my one and only way to get my political voice heard.

And ‘Yes’, I picked myself as Leader of the SOS Party because the SOS Party is a one-man band.

I’ve got a simple motto when it comes to politics. Whatever politicians say no too, I say yes too. Whatever politicians say yes too, I say no too.

It’s been since watching 'September Clues' and 'Moon Rising’; I have come to the conclusion that everything I've believed to be true is in fact a lie.
Hence the reason why I’ve joined this forum.
There is no way in hell that I’d vote for any of the political parties because I have come to the conclusion that my vote is worthless. The establishment dictates what is going to happen to our futures and my vote won’t make one bit of difference to their will.

Like I wrote in my book, The SOS Political Manual (Available from no book stores), and which no doubt all of you know to be true, the establishment is like a fictional company, which secretly owns both Pepsi and Coca Cola. They play each brand of the other giving the customer the illusion they have choice. When in actually fact it’s the same product in both cans!

The SOS Party is the only way that I can pretend to have control over my own destiny. And I stand by my policies.

How I’d reward people going to church?
Giving them a Sunday Roast.

Legalizing all drugs is a bloody good idea. People out there have friends who have been caught in the spiral of despair, which addicts go through. Hey, I’ve got a sister who’s a heroin addict and it’s killed my mother as a result, so I know more than anyone the pain drugs cause.

If my sister could have got her drugs without committing crime to get it, perhaps the a lot of the worst shit wouldn’t have happened.

If heroin and smack wasn’t mixed with rat poison, cyanide, talcum powder and other such stuff, perhaps so many people wouldn’t have died.
Hey, the legalization of all drugs has never been tried so how can any of you say it wouldn’t work?
One thing is for certain. The illegalization of drugs has been tried and it hasn’t worked.

According to the documentary channels I watch, over a trillion dollars has been spent on tackling crimes.

Well, that was money down the drain wasn’t it?

Hey, why not try something radical? Like giving them what they want without them having to commit crime to get it.

How can any off you say the SOS policies are unworkable when none of them have ever been tried? I just don’t get it?
Some people out there don’t like leaders…
Hey dude, you’d better get used to it. Leaders are everywhere. And a new generation is coming up through the ranks.
OK OK, yes I may be misguided. But how would you feel if someone said that to you? But I’ll take it on the chin.
Let me assure you. I’m for real…

Tuesday, 12 October 2010

Why the British Judicial System should be dumped!

I stand by my comments. Yes, I think it’ll be in the national interest for the judicial system to be abandoned.
Isn’t it after all the means in which the ruling elite controls the masses?
The Lords of the land make the Laws of the land. The common people have no say.
In the 21st century this should change. All laws as we know them to be now should be ripped up and throw away.
A new set all laws democratically agreed by the people of Britain can then replace the old.
I’m not for one moment advocating doing away with laws. No way. I’m advocating doing away with the laws forced upon us by people who haven’t got the people’s interest at heart.
The secrecy surrounding family courts. For one that’s a travesty!
Sentencing is a joke. Go down for two, serve one. It makes no sense.
Should even the crime of murder be reviewed? Why is it illegal to murder another individual but yet in the name of war it’s not?
Isn’t even jury by twelve peers a flawed out-dated method of determining innocence or guilt?
Wouldn’t a computer be better?
Isn’t even the assumption of innocence over guilt a flawed starting point too? Perhaps the system would work better if we are all assumed guilty of the crimes brought against us and it’s then up to the accused to prove their innocence.
I have so many questions about the reliability and justibility of our judicial system. So no, I will not retract my statement.
The British Judicial System should go…. Or at the very least, be subjected to a massive rethink…
I'm Matthew Taylor and I vote SOS.